Episode summary: Daniel Taylor was 17 years old when he was arrested for a 1992 double homicide in Chicago. But Daniel had an alibi. He was in jail at the time of the murders. Say hello on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram. Sign up for our occasional newsletter, The Accomplice. Follow the show and rev...

There’s more ➢

Episode summary: How environmentally destructive is our thirst for coffee? Tim and the team investigate a claim that 29,000 coffee pods end up in landfill globally every minute with the help of Dr Ying Jiang, a senior lecturer in bioenergy from Cranfield University in the UK.

Episode summary: Why 1870 - 2010 were such extraordinary years.

Episode summary: The importance of humor and art in protesting (and ousting!) oppressive regimes

Episode summary: Melvyn Bragg and guests discuss A Theory of Justice by John Rawls (1921 - 2002) which has been called the most influential book in twentieth century political philosophy. It was first published in 1971. Rawls (pictured above) drew on his own experience in WW2 and saw the chance in i...

There’s more ➢

Episode summary: José van Dijck is arguably the preeminent sociologist in the Netherlands, conducting research about how online platforms have crept into public life that has proved foundational to European regulation like the Digital Services Act. Today on Reimagining the Internet, José talks to us...

There’s more ➢

Episode summary: In 2016, a man named Anthony Novak created a parody Facebook page of his local police department. “I just thought, ‘That would be funny.’” About a month later, he was arrested. Novak is now petitioning the Supreme Court, and The Onion submitted an amicus brief in support of his case...

There’s more ➢

Episode summary: When LA punks were looking for a place to play in the late 1970s, Chinatown welcomed the unruly scene. But it was an uneasy alliance that led to fierce rivalries, hurt feelings, blatant racism, and broken toilets. At the center of it all was Esther Wong.

Episode summary: A Treat for the Die-Hards

Episode summary: What if a business owner asserts that serving a gay customer violates their first amendment rights?