Just for a laugh, I went on the hunt at Science Blogs, searching for “agricultureâ€. I read the first 15 entries.
- About an artist who wanted to examine GM agriculture.
- About pollution from intensive chicken operations.
- About fund-raising for schools in the US, one of which is in an agricultural district.
- About academia in northeast China.
- About that fund-raising again, from an agriculture teacher (who wants to buy forestry equipment).
- About bird ‘flu, blaming poultry for the problem.
- About industrial agriculture, lambasting Dow Chemical.
- About industrial agriculture, and E. coli in hamburger.
- About parking being more polluting than agriculture.
- Another one about bird ‘flu, in Indonesia.
- About agriculture and human diversity.
- About diet changes in the Mesolithic.
- About how agriculture permitted epidemics of disease by increasing population density.
- About the rise of industrial agriculture and fall of farmers.
- About resistance developing among pests in organic apples orchards.
All very interesting. and I’m not complaining. (Well, I am, a bit.) But truly, aren’t people interested in farming as ecology, or as an evolutionary experimental lab, or as selection in action, or as a driver of human change, or, or, or?
Those 15 posts take us back to October 1st, so it isn’t as if there is a shortage of posts that contain the word “agricultureâ€. But they’re not really about how we feed ourselves.
I’m just sayin’ is all, possibly because over at The Other Place we’ve just celebrated a year of blogging about agricultural biodiversity, agrobiodiversity, agro-eco-biodiversity and a whole lot of other mouthfuls. Literally.